Which statement best contrasts Method 2 and Method 3?

Which statement best contrasts Method 2 and Method 3?

• A. Method 2 is always faster, while Method 3 is not.
• B. Method 3 can reuse existing PAF columns; Method 2 does not mention that.
• C. Method 2 can display multiple networked items easily, while Method 3 cannot.
• D. Both methods require coding in M.

Answer: (B)

The key idea here is how each method handles existing data structures, specifically PAF columns. Reusing existing PAF columns means you can map outputs or results to fields that are already defined, which keeps data consistent, avoids duplicating fields, and eases integration with other parts of the system. The statement that Method 3 can reuse existing PAF columns, while Method 2 does not mention this capability, highlights a practical difference in how the two methods can fit into an established data model. If you already have PAF columns set up, Method 3 offers a straightforward way to leverage them, making it easier to align new results with existing data workflows. That concrete capability is why this choice best contrasts the methods. The other statements rely on attributes that aren’t specified or are less universally true: speed can vary with context, display capabilities for multiple items aren’t described, and whether coding in M is required isn’t stated for both methods.

The key idea here is how each method handles existing data structures, specifically PAF columns. Reusing existing PAF columns means you can map outputs or results to fields that are already defined, which keeps data consistent, avoids duplicating fields, and eases integration with other parts of the system. The statement that Method 3 can reuse existing PAF columns, while Method 2 does not mention this capability, highlights a practical difference in how the two methods can fit into an established data model. If you already have PAF columns set up, Method 3 offers a straightforward way to leverage them, making it easier to align new results with existing data workflows. That concrete capability is why this choice best contrasts the methods.

The other statements rely on attributes that aren’t specified or are less universally true: speed can vary with context, display capabilities for multiple items aren’t described, and whether coding in M is required isn’t stated for both methods.